I would like to be able to limit the size of attachments which will filter out large WMF files. This would need an autoresponse to the sender that the email was blocked because there is a limit of xxMB for attachments. In my business I use yousendit.com for large files.

The site currently has the ability to tell you how much space you are using, but it would be much easier if it could also tell me what exactly was taking up so much space. Maybe display the top 10 biggest directories their size, and their path?

You can't move a message to a folder after having read it. You have to close it, wait, and then move it.

There are many alternative web hosting controls panels available, some are GPL. It's just an idea, but offering alternatives to proprietary CP's may draw more customers. http://en.wikipedia....ontrol_panels http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_panel_(W
eb_hosting)... [show more]

There are many alternative web hosting controls panels available, some are GPL. It's just an idea, but offering alternatives to proprietary CP's may draw more customers.

http://en.wikipedia....ontrol_panels

http://en.wikipedia....(Web_hosting) [show less]

Showing the status of a VPS within OnSite, similar to status.modwest but without the stats and with checks only being performed on login.

It would be nice if the spam filter blacklist would default to catching subdomains. For instance, if I enter: *@spammers.com It won't catch *@smarter.spammers.com I don't want to have to go to my blacklist every time spammers.com comes up with another subdomain to enter a new entry. Also, it wouldn't make much sense to have to have two spam rules that looked like this: *@spammers.com *@*.spammers.com (if this is e... [show more]

It would be nice if the spam filter blacklist would default to catching subdomains.

For instance, if I enter:
*@spammers.com

It won't catch *@smarter.spammers.com

I don't want to have to go to my blacklist every time spammers.com comes up with another subdomain to enter a new entry. Also, it wouldn't make much sense to have to have two spam rules that looked like this:
*@spammers.com
*@*.spammers.com
(if this is even valid)

It seems that *@spammers.com should be enough.

Maybe a checkbox to enable/disable this behavior instead of default. [show less]

Like in a pinball game. For when I kick the machine too hard.

Redesign the email management interface to include a less tricky nobounce forwarding solution for mail that should have no reply path